What the FCA has decided
On 3 September 2026 the FCA published its decision to ban Daniel Thomas from working in financial services and to fine him £742,700, after finding that he recklessly gave defined benefit pension transfer advice he was neither qualified nor allowed to give. Mr Thomas has referred the Decision Notice to the Upper Tribunal, where he will present his case. The FCA says its findings are provisional, that they reflect the FCA’s belief as to what occurred, and that no action will be taken until the Tribunal reaches its decision.
Mr Thomas was a director and financial adviser at DPT Financial Solutions Limited. Over five years he advised 53 clients about 63 transfers out of defined benefit pension schemes, and is believed to have earned more than £173,000 in fees. The FCA states that he repeatedly misled clients and pension providers about his professional qualifications, destroyed client records, and failed to co-operate with the investigation. Therese Chambers, the FCA’s executive director of enforcement and market oversight, said he had “recklessly betrayed that responsibility”.
DPT Financial Solutions was an appointed representative. Another authorised firm, a principal, was responsible for overseeing what it did, and the FCA states that Mr Thomas provided misleading information to that principal about his involvement in the pension transfer cases. The oversight structure was in place, but the principal received misleading information.
Authorisation and permission
The FCA’s statement of the rule is general. It is not normally in consumers’ best interests to transfer out of a defined benefit pension, because those schemes provide valuable guaranteed benefits which increase annually. That is why only advisers with specialist qualifications and the correct permissions can advise on whether to transfer out.
There are two requirements. The firm must hold the permission, and the individual must hold the specialist qualification. A firm that is authorised by the FCA can still be a firm that is not permitted to advise on a defined benefit transfer, and the phrase “they’re FCA regulated” does not distinguish between those cases. The Financial Services Register records both: whether a firm is authorised, and which regulated activities it is permitted to carry on. The FCA’s consumer tool is built to check whether a firm is authorised and has permission for the service it is offering.
FCA, 3 September 2026: only advisers with specialist qualifications and the correct permissions can advise on whether to transfer out of a defined benefit pension.
Appointed representatives
An appointed representative carries on regulated activity under the responsibility of an authorised firm, the principal. The FCA’s published expectations of a principal are specific.
- It must have a written agreement setting out what business the appointed representative can do.
- It must assess the appointed representative before appointing them, to establish that they are fit and proper, financially stable and suitable to carry out business for the firm.
- It must notify the FCA at least 30 days before the appointment takes effect.
- It must take reasonable steps to ensure the appointed representative acts within the scope of their appointment, and it must ensure they continue to meet the necessary standards, including the Consumer Duty, for the regulated activities it has accepted responsibility for.
The boundary of an appointed representative is the scope of the appointment, and that is whatever the written agreement between the two firms covers. It is not the principal’s full permission set. A practice that looks up a firm and sees only the principal’s wide permissions has not checked what the appointment covers. The question to ask is who the principal is and what the appointment covers. It goes on file once per firm.
Nothing in that sequence requires a permission the accountant does not have, and nothing in it is advice. The division of roles is set out in who does what, and how an introduction is recorded in the anatomy of an introduction. In an Altro partnership the firm is Equity & General, whose authorisation and permissions are on the Financial Services Register under FCA number 474163, and each introduction is made through the portal in the firm’s name and tracked there from the first call to advice in place.
What is not yet settled
The case is live. The findings are provisional pending the Upper Tribunal, no hearing date has been published, and the Tribunal’s decision will appear on its own website. The FCA has not named the principal firm in its press release, and has not said what supervisory consequence, if any, follows for that firm. Follow the FCA’s press release and the Tribunal’s published decisions.
The structure underneath the case is settled: the Register, the permission regime, the specialist qualification requirement for defined benefit transfers, and the published duties of a principal firm towards its appointed representatives. A practice can act on those today.
Introductions after a case like this
The FCA’s Financial Lives 2024 survey found that 8.6% of UK adults had taken regulated financial advice in the previous twelve months, and 13% of the self-employed. The figures are set out on the advice gap. A case like this is a reason to check permissions before each introduction. The client in the example was going to look into her pension either way. The check takes a few minutes per firm, and the accountant sees the deferred scheme in the paperwork.