A client going through their own paperwork

When the pension joins the estate in April 2027

For deaths on or after 6 April 2027, a pension fund and an identical asset held outside a pension are taxed differently for inheritance tax, and the pension is taxed worse. The reliefs that apply to the asset held personally do not apply inside the pension.

7 min read · Altro Partners, by Equity & General

£360,000
of inheritance tax on a £900,000 pension in the illustration below, due in full within six months of death, with none of the four reliefs to reduce or defer it
Illustration using a made-up client
Reacting to

AJ Bell warns HMRC creating ‘two-tier’ IHT system for pensions (Money Marketing, 11 August 2026)

Leaving the pension alone and spending other assets first was correct under the rules as they stood. A client who ordered their retirement income that way now has a plan based on rules that will no longer apply, and the practice that prepares their accounts can see which clients are still running it.

What changes on 6 April 2027

Finance Act 2026 brings most unused pension funds and pension death benefits within the estate for inheritance tax for deaths on or after 6 April 2027. HMRC set out the mechanics in its technical note Inheritance Tax on pensions, published on 11 May 2026 and updated on 29 May 2026. We covered the headline arithmetic in what the trust register tells you before April 2027.

Two exclusions apply. Death in service benefits payable from a registered pension scheme are excluded. So are dependants' scheme pensions from a defined benefit arrangement or a collective money purchase arrangement. Everything else in the unused-fund and death-benefit category is in scope.

The note introduces the term notional pension property. That is what the estate is treated as holding. The member is not treated as owning the scheme's underlying assets, only a notional amount equal to their value. That drafting is why four reliefs fall away.

The reliefs that do not apply inside the pension

HMRC's technical note confirms that notional pension property does not fall within the definition of qualifying property, and is neither relevant business property nor agricultural property. It follows that:

Business property relief does not apply

Trading company shares that would attract relief held personally attract none inside a pension.

Agricultural property relief does not apply

On the same reasoning.

Loss on sale relief does not apply

Notional pension property is outside the definitions of qualifying investments and interests in land, so a fall in value between death and sale cannot be reclaimed.

Payment by instalments is not available

The instalment option attaches to qualifying property. Notional pension property is not qualifying property, so the tax is due in one payment.

Rachel Vahey, head of public policy at AJ Bell, described the effect as a two-tier tax system. On the reliefs point the primary source supports that description: identical assets, different treatment, decided by whether they sit inside a pension.

The figures for one estate

Illustration, using a made-up client. An owner-manager dies in 2028, aged 78, leaving:

The pension part of the estate in the illustration

Made-up client

Small self-administered scheme, notional pension property from 6 April 2027£900,000
of which the trading premises the company operates from£600,000
of which invested£300,000
Inheritance tax at 40%, payable in full at the end of the sixth month after death£360,000

Under the rules for deaths before 6 April 2027 the pension is outside the estate. From 6 April 2027 the £900,000 is notional pension property. At 40% that is an inheritance tax charge of £360,000, and none of the four reliefs above reduces or defers it. Business property relief does not reach inside the pension, so the fact that £600,000 of it is the trading premises changes nothing. The instalment option is closed, so the charge is payable at the end of the sixth month after the date of death, in full.

An owner-manager in the premises the company trades from

Because the member died after age 75, the existing income tax treatment of death benefits also applies: the beneficiaries are taxed at their marginal rate on what they draw. AJ Bell's calculation puts the combined effective rate at up to 64% for a higher-rate beneficiary and 67% for an additional-rate one. 40% inheritance tax leaves 60%; 40% income tax on that 60% takes a further 24%.

For the accountant the figure is £360,000, due within six months, against a scheme whose largest asset is the building the company trades from.

The relief question decides how much is owed, and the instalment question decides whether the estate can pay it without selling the premises.

Who is liable

Personal representatives are responsible for reporting and liable for paying the inheritance tax due on notional pension property. From the vesting point, beneficiaries become jointly and severally liable alongside them.

In an owner-managed company the personal representative is a family member, and sometimes a partner of the firm. Either way, the person who has to find £360,000 within six months will telephone the accountant. The technical note sets out the timing: pension scheme valuations are due within 28 days of a request, and withholding notices remain valid for 15 months after the end of the month in which the deceased died. Those deadlines are workable if the position is known in advance.

The exemptions that must be claimed

The spouse or civil partner exemption and the charity exemption continue to apply. HMRC's note states that they are not taken into account when calculating the value of the notional pension property, and that personal representatives have to claim them separately. That is a line for the practice's probate checklist.

What the accountant holds and what the financial planner holds

The practice holds the evidence: the size of the fund, the property inside the scheme, the shareholding that carries relief personally, the estate with no obvious liquidity.

The financial planner holds the modelling: whether drawing more now changes the outcome, how that interacts with the client's income needs and income tax position, and whether the asset should sit where it sits.

An accountant noticing that a client's pension has been left untouched for a reason that ends on 6 April 2027, and saying so, is observation. Recommending what to do about it is regulated advice. Who does what sets out the split, and what a client file already shows sets out the other facts in the file.

The FCA's Financial Lives 2024 survey found that 8.6% of UK adults had taken regulated financial advice in the previous twelve months, and 13% of the self-employed. The advice gap sets out who that leaves.

Two things to do this week

  1. List the deliberately untouched funds. Clients over 55 with a pension they have been advised, or have decided, to leave alone for estate reasons. The practice can build the list from what it already knows.
  2. Find the property inside the schemes. Any SSAS or SIPP holding commercial property, in particular the premises the client's own company trades from. The estate faces a six-month deadline against an asset that cannot be sold quickly and that the company may need.

What is still uncertain

The reform is in Finance Act 2026 and the commencement date is fixed at 6 April 2027. The secondary legislation and supporting guidance, which HMRC has said will be published for April 2027, and the draft regulations on information sharing between schemes and personal representatives, are outstanding. Until they are published, the operational detail of how a personal representative obtains a valuation and settles the charge is less settled than the principle.

AJ Bell is arguing that denying business and agricultural relief inside a pension is wrong in policy terms, and other bodies may press the same point before April 2027. That is a policy argument, and the law has not changed. Planning conversations held now should assume the rules as legislated.

Common questions

Does this affect clients who were told their pension sits outside their estate?

Yes. Leaving a pension untouched so it passed outside the estate was correct under the rules as they stood. For deaths on or after 6 April 2027 most unused pension funds and pension death benefits count in the estate for inheritance tax (Finance Act 2026), so the plan and the rule now point in opposite directions. The client has done nothing wrong and nothing needs unwinding in a hurry. The assumption underneath their retirement income order is no longer the one HMRC works to.

Which pension death benefits stay outside the new rules?

HMRC's technical note confirms two exclusions. Death in service benefits payable from a registered pension scheme remain outside the inheritance tax charge. So do dependants' scheme pensions paid from a defined benefit arrangement or a collective money purchase arrangement. Everything else in the unused-fund and death-benefit category is in scope from 6 April 2027. For an owner-managed company, a registered group life arrangement may be the one part of the picture that stays outside the estate, so check which category a client's cover sits in.

Why can inheritance tax on a pension not be paid by instalments?

Because of how the legislation defines what is being taxed. HMRC treats the amount brought into the estate as notional pension property, and the member is not treated as owning the scheme's underlying assets. Notional pension property does not fall within the definition of qualifying property, and the instalment option attaches only to qualifying property. The tax is due at the end of the sixth month after the date of death, in one payment, whatever the fund is invested in.

What does this mean for a SSAS or SIPP that owns the trading premises?

From April 2027 the property's value forms part of a charge payable within six months of death, with no instalment option and no business property relief to reduce it. The scheme cannot sell the premises quickly, and selling them means the trading company loses its home. That is a liquidity question to raise with the client and the financial planner before it becomes an executor's problem.

Where does the accountant's work stop and the financial planner's begin?

The accountant sees the facts first, because they are in things the practice already holds: the size of an untouched fund, a property inside a scheme, a shareholding that carries business relief personally, an estate with no obvious liquidity. Naming that and stating the deadline is ordinary professional work. Modelling drawdown, weighing an extraction strategy against the client's retirement income, and recommending any change to how a pension is held or drawn are regulated advice and sit with the Equity & General financial planner.

Financial planning for your clients, alongside the accounts and tax work

Equity & General holds the FCA authorisation. There is no charge to your firm, and a named partnership director works with you from the first introduction.